Emergency & Disaster
Relief Partners Network
Committed to deploying fast, targeted aid to affected areas — with on-chain infrastructure, emergency response and media partners.
8 organisations are in conversation, across supervision, payments and reach. None has committed. No organisation is named here until it approves its own wording, in writing.


We are leveraging our technology to deploy relief. We need the people who can direct it.
Blockchain companies, corporations, emergency aid and relief organisations, and government partners — sign up so we can coordinate as one network instead of four separate efforts.
Coordinate access to relief funds
Money reaches a targeted disaster area through one shared map, so two organisations never fund the same block while the next one goes untouched.
Facilitate the use of those funds
Partners decide who is eligible and where. The rail settles it wallet-to-wallet in seconds, publicly, with nothing deducted in transit.
Deploy the Connector
Our transmission agent reaches people calling for aid over plain SMS — no app, no data plan — matches them to what they need, and reports back to the organisations coordinating the response.
The same dollar, four fewer hops.
Today, emergency cash passes through four organisations before it reaches a person. A donor funds an international agency. The agency contracts a local partner. The partner contracts a payment provider. The provider finally pays out. Every handover is a contract to sign and an account to reconcile, and every one of them adds days.
Here there is one handover. The funder's wallet pays the person's wallet.
The route
UsuallyDonor to agency to local partner to a payment provider to the person. Each hop is contracted separately and reconciled separately.
HereThe funder's wallet to the person's wallet. One hop. We never take custody of it, so there is no account of ours for it to sit in.
What arrives
UsuallyWhatever is left after administration, currency conversion and the cost of running the distribution itself.
HereThe amount that was funded. Nothing is administered, converted or skimmed on the way — a dollar in is a dollar received, and our own fees are waived for this response.
How fast
UsuallyWeeks between a pledge and money in someone's hand: provider contracting, registration, distribution logistics.
HereSeconds between a claim and settled funds, once a partner has opened a zone. The delay is the decision, not the plumbing.
What you can see
UsuallyA report at the end of a reporting cycle, reconciled from records held by several different organisations.
HereEvery claim is a public transaction the moment it lands — time, amount, transaction hash. Auditable by anyone, including the donor, while it is still happening.
Who can receive it
UsuallySomeone with a bank account or mobile money, or who can reach a distribution point during the hours it is open.
HereSomeone with any handset that can send a text. No app, no smartphone, no data plan — which is what an area with damaged infrastructure actually has.
Knowing whether it worked
UsuallyA post-distribution monitoring survey, sampled from a subset of households, weeks or months after the money moved.
HereClaims are made by verified accounts — a confirmed phone number, and an email where one is given. So a partner can follow up with the people it actually reached, ask what the money went on, and carry that into the next zone. Contact details are the person's to give and to withdraw, never scraped, and shared only where they opted in.
Knowing what an area needs
UsuallyA needs assessment: teams going block to block, or a cluster meeting compiling reports from several agencies, with the picture arriving days behind the situation it describes.
HerePeople already text the connector in their own words — medical supplies, rescue, structural damage, water, shelter. An AI agent classifies each message into the IASC humanitarian clusters the response is already coordinated in, and counts distinct people per area per hour rather than message volume. Partners read where need is concentrating while it is happening. It listens; it does not dispatch, and it never competes for the network someone is using to reach their family.
Funding the same place twice
UsuallyDeduplicating across agencies working the same district is a standing, well-known problem in every large response.
HereThe area is tiled into hexagons that cannot overlap, each with its own budget and claim cap. A funded hex is visibly funded, to everyone.
What this is not
Cash is not the whole response. It does not clear a road, fly in water, or pull anyone out of a collapsed building. The organisations and the people on the ground do that, and none of this is worth anything without them.
What cash does, where shops are still trading and transport still runs, is let someone decide for themselves what they need this week — faster than any supply chain can guess it. Where that is not true of an area, cash is the wrong tool, and the partner coordinating that area is the one who says so. Then no zone opens there.
Contribute the one thing
you are best at.
No login. You send the form, we reply with a draft of exactly how your card would read, and nothing is published until you approve the wording in writing.
Two minutes. No account needed.
Nothing has been distributed and no programme is being announced. Lucilla is not a humanitarian organisation and does not select or verify recipients — a supervising partner does.